MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620649326 · doi:10.4172/1488-5069.1000039

The evaluation of male infertility

2002· article· en· W2620649326 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François Bénard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sexual & Reproductive Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMale infertilityInfertilityGynecologyAndrologyMedicineBiologyPregnancyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data available over the past 25 years regarding infertility reveal that, in approximately one-third of cases, significant pathology is found in the man alone, while in 20% of cases, abnormalities are found in both the man and the woman.It is often recommended that clinical evaluation of the couple be delayed until one year of unprotected intercourse has passed.Because more couples wait until their late 30s to try to conceive, however, the initial screening of the man should be considered whenever a patient presents with the chief complaint of infertility.Advances are being made rapidly in both the diagnosis and treatment of infertile men.Semen analysis is the most important test to direct the necessary evaluation.With continued work in this field and continued development of available diagnostic and treatment modalities, clinicians will be able to treat infertile couples more successfully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sexual & Reproductive MedicineSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207