MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2620760025 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2017.129

P.044 Prospective clinical detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate to predict IDH-mutant gliomas using magnetic resonance spectroscopy: preliminary results

2017· article· en· W2620760025 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
M Taccone, Thi Viet Ha Nguyen, John Woulfe, Ioana Moldovan, Gerd Melkus, Cameron Ig, Fahad Alkherayf

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsocitrate dehydrogenaseGliomaIDH1MedicineBiomarkerNeurosurgeryMagnetic resonance imagingIn vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopyProspective cohort studyPathologyNuclear medicineOncologyMutantBiologyCancer researchRadiologyGeneGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With the advent of the 2016 WHO classification of tumours, prognostically distinct subclasses of glioma have been revealed. A subset of gliomas which harbor the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation have a survival advantage. 2-Hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) is a byproduct of faulty IDH metabolism in IDH mutants making it an ideal tumour biomarker. Since pre-operative detection of this metabolite using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) may yield valuable information for the neurosurgeon, we undertook the first Canadian utility study to detect 2-HG via MRS. Methods: We will recruit 150 patients presenting with a newly suspected glioma. All patients will undergo MRS scans for 2-HG pre-operatively and the neuropathologist will determine IDH status post-operatively based on immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. Pre-operative detection of 2-HG will be compared to post-operative IDH status. Results: To date, of 34 eligible subjects, 29 have glioma determined by pathology. Seven of these were IDH-mutant positive by pathology, of which 3 were detected by MRS. One glioma positive for 2-HG on MRS turned out to be IDH mutant negative on pathology. Conclusions: Prospective detection of 2-HG via MRS is feasible in the clinical setting. Additional subjects as well as refinement of our MRS protocol may yield higher sensitivity and specificity of this novel and clinically relevant diagnostic tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→