Applications of the Unsteady Error Transport Equation on Unstructured Meshes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical study of using the error transport equation, an auxiliary problem to a set of model equations, is performed to obtain higher-order accurate error estimates and corrections for applications in unsteady compressible flow. In many such applications, a functional of the solution is often examined as a proxy for the accuracy of the solution itself. Several measures of time-dependent functionals are used for test cases that have a periodic steady-state solution. The approach is verified by examining unsteady functionals for diffusion and advection model problems, and then the error transport method is applied to the von Kármán vortex shedding test case, a difficult problem to establish accuracy properties on its own. It was found that scalar measures of the unsteady functionals not only give the order of accuracy that would be expected from a primal discretization only but also the expected higher-order accuracy if the functionals were computed using the solutions corrected by this accurate error estimate, all without the otherwise necessary requirement of discretizing to higher order in both time and space for the primal problem. The results are consistent with previous studies on solution error using simple test cases with manufactured solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it