MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2620867751 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2017.163

P.079 Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging metallic susceptibility artifacts post cardiac surgery in children

2017· article· en· W2620867751 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullah J Alanezi, C. Campbell, A. Cevallos Andrade

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac surgeryCardiologyPopulationInternal medicineSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Metallic susceptibility artifact (MSA) on brain MRI has been described rarely in adult population as an incidental finding in patients undergone cardiac surgery, catheterization or prosthetic heart valve, but has not been described before in the pediatric population. Here we present two pediatric cases with MSA on brain MRI post-cardiac surgery. Case Series:Patient1: 13-month-old girl with Transposition of great arteries, aortic coarctation and multiple VSDs, who twice had open heart surgery requiring cardiac bypass. She presented with bilateral lower extremity paralysis secondary to spinal cord embolic infarction, Brain MRI showed an incidental finding of hundreds of diffuse foci of brain MSA. Patient2: 5-year-old boy with Trisomy21, Atrial-ventricular septal defect repaired at age one year. His brain MRI showed incidental finding of multiple, widespread foci of MSA during investigation for gait disturbance. Discussion: Here we present two pediatric patients post-cardiac surgery, found to have multiple scattered MSA in cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres and brain stem. Presumably, these are secondary to metallic microthrombi during cardiac surgery, however, neither had prosthetic material. Metallic microthrombi may be related to cardio-pulmonary bypass. Pediatric cardiac surgery patients should be studied, to understand the significance of these lesions and further distinguish the cause and association of these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→