MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620998417 · doi:10.36456/waktu.v15i1.426

PENGARUH BEBAN HIDROLIK MEDIA DALAM MENURUNKAN SENYAWA AMMONIA PADA LIMBAH CAIR RUMAH POTONG AYAM (RPA)

2017· article· id· W2620998417 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Al Kholif, Rhenny Ratnawati

Bibliographic record

VenueWaktu · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsChemistryAmmoniaOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limbah rumah potong ayam (RPA) umumnya mengandung zat pencemar seperti Biological Oxygen Deman (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Deman (COD) dan Amonia yang tinggi. Umumnya senyawa pencemar tersebut terbentuk dalam pencernaan lipid. Kandungan ammonia pada limbah rumah potong ayam umumnya melebihi baku mutu yang sudah ditetapkan. Biofilter anaerob merupakan salah satu metode pengolahan limbah cair yang dapat diterapkan untuk mengolah air limbah RPA. Tujuan yang ingin dicapai adalah mengkaji kemampuan beban hidrolik media dalam menurunkan senyawa amonia pada air limbah RPA. Beban hidrolik media yang digunakan terdiri dari tiga variasi yaitu diantaranya 0,006 m3/m2media.hari, 0,009 m3/m2media.hari dan 0,015 m3/m2media.hari. Media yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu media karbon aktif untuk menurunkan beban pencemar ammonia pada air limbah RPA dengan sistem biofilter anaerob tercelup aliran upflow. Reaktor yang digunakan dalam percobaan ini adalah terdiri dari 3 reaktor dengan ukuran berbeda-beda. Efisiensi penyisihan kandungan amonia disimpulkan bahwa penerapan beban hidrolik media 0,006 m3/m2media.hari mampu menyisihkan senyawa ammonia lebih dari 95%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaktuSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207