Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<H1>Introduction<TX1>Interest groups have long played a key role in the academic understanding of BC politics, whether as organizations expressing or mediating social forces reflected in the province's distinctive party system, (Black 1968;Blake 1996;Robin 1973) or as private political actors engaged in a narrow range of activities ("lobbying") aimed at advancing economic self-interest in the content of public policy (Kristianson 1996).Increasingly, these perspectives have been supplemented by new ones that recognize both the great variety of roles played by interest groups, their growing institutionalization, the reciprocal relations of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the importance of new social movements in BC society.<TX2>BC politics in the early 21 st century has certainly been marked by both a proliferation and an institutionalization of interest groups, which suggests that a corresponding move toward pluralism and institutionalism at the level of theory is called for.But, however tempting it may be to declare a rupture with the past of "labour versus capital," either on the ground or in the classroom, BC politics remains distinct from most other provinces in its strong ideological polarization and intense
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it