Bibliographic record
Abstract
The profiles of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) were compared in three separate studies involving air samples collected in urban and rural locations across Canada. In the Freelton/Pier 25 study (conducted near Hamilton, Ontario) a total of 32 NPAH were analyzed for in 12 composite air particulate samples from Freelton (a rural site) and Pier 25 (an urban site) using negative ion chemical ionization gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The NPAH levels at the two sites were found to be similar except for the two samples at Pier 25. These results were consistent with the PAH levels determined previously which showed significantly increased levels at Pier 25 under the same condition when the sampling site was downwind of the urban/industrial core. NPAH may be significant contributors to mutation induction due to exposures to ambient air since the offspring of male mice from the Pier 25 site exposed to ambient air showed inherited mutation rates about 2 times greater than offspring of mice exposed at the Freelton site. NPAH are highly mutagenic and carcinogenic compounds that act via reductive metabolism and can be readily metabolized to potent reactive intermediates within all cells. Concentration data for a set of polycyclic aromatic compounds were obtained for samples collected during the day and night during a study in Simcoe (rural) and Toronto (urban) as well as at three sites in British Columbia as part of the Pacific 2001 study (Slocan (urban), Langley (suburban/rural) and Sumas (rural)). The conversion of these concentration data into particulate loadings data (using elemental carbon data) enabled us to perform a number of unique interpretations and analyses of the data sets. Since particulate loadings values are not affected by air dispersion it was possible to compare samples and individual PAC across a range of samples. Principal components analysis of the loadings data showed dramatic differences between the urban and rural sites from each study. Day-night samples at the rural sites also showed dramatic profile differences. The urban sites showed significantly less differences in profiles, consistent with lesser degree of air transformation and closer proximities to sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".