MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621100928 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v10n3p104

Legal Effect of Subtract Physical in Iranian Jurisprudence and Law

2017· article· en· W2621100928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Khalafi, Mohammad Roshan, Ebrahim Taghizadeh, Abbas Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecreeLawWifeJurisprudenceCivilizationResidenceFiqhSociologyIslamPolitical scienceShariaPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Iranian law, only entities that can be said is similar to physical subtraction, iddah entity after revocable divorce. During the iddah, couples living together have some obligations, but not forced to lay in between. And in another, though, for fear the loss of his wife, is allowed to subtract the location of the shared residence. It must be said that this system is rational and human relations based on the wisdom of civilization is permissible insofar as it does not conflict with Islamic law. If intellectuals of today's society conclude that stipulated in the divorce decree was not rational and not in the interest of society must predict good strategies to restore them to life and as far as possible be required. Basically, physical subtraction is expected to act before divorce to assess at this time to prevent the occurrence of problems after divorce and couples come to life with stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.040
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207