Abstract 321: Deletion Of The Translational Repressors Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4e Binding Proteins 1 And 2 Protects Against Pressure Overload Induced Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assembly of the translation initiation machinery is negatively regulated by the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding proteins, which sequester the mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E, thus preventing assembly of an intact initiation complex. However, the role of translational control on the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been systematically examined. Here we perturbed translational control in mice by knockout of both 4E binding protein 1 (Eif4ebp1) and 2 (Eif4ebp2) (designated as Eif4ebp1/2 double knockout) to study its impact on left ventricular hypertrophy and CHF resulting from transverse aortic constriction. Eif4ebp1/2 double knockout caused a modest increase in left ventricular mass under basal conditions. However, following transverse aortic constriction, Eif4ebp1/2 double knockout profoundly attenuated the development of CHF and its attendant mortality. Examination of candidate genes involved in the mechanism revealed increased expression of transcription factors for genes governing energy metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis with corresponding increases in the expression of their target genes. Our data indicate that removing physiological restraints on translation initiation exerts a profound cardiac protective effect against pressure overload induced CHF, suggesting that method(s) to disrupt the function of the 4E binding proteins may be a novel therapeutic approach for preventing or treating CHF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".