State Policy Priorities for Economic Security Provision among Processing Industries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Russian specificity of processing industry functioning does not allow domestic products to compete on an equal basis with imported analogues, not only at external, but also at the domestic market, which makes a negative impact on the level of economic security. In this context, the harmonization of industrial and trade policies can be viewed as the combination of individual development institutions aimed at the search of external and internal sources of investment resources, as well as the development of import-substituting industrialization policy trends. The results of modeling using the modified Grossman-Helpman model demonstrate that the hypothesis about the dependence of import tariff rate on the strength of industrial lobby groups is not confirmed. Consequently, the tariff foreign trade policy of Russia is a fragmentary one and does not develop the unified principles and priorities for key processing industry support. In this regard, the main task is the development of universal tools that allow to increase the level of business entity adaptability to the increased volatility of endogenous and exogenous factors negatively influencing the level of economic security among industrial complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it