Bibliographic record
Abstract
La ville de Montréal reste, depuis le XIXe siècle, le lieu privilégié de l’immigration au Québec. Regroupant plus d’une centaine de communautés distinctes, elle répond aujourd’hui à l’appellation de ville cosmopolite qu’on pourrait comme un modèle de vivre ensemble qui va au-delà de la simple juxtaposition de communautés ethniques sur un même territoire. La ville cosmopolite est une ville à identités plurielles partagées par ses habitants. Comment l’immigration marque-t-elle le visage de Montréal ? Comment se transcrit le cosmopolitisme dans la ville ? Montréal ne répond-elle pas plutôt à des logiques de ségrégation, de zonage ou de cohabitation des nouvelles populations immigrantes avec les populations locales ? S’agit-il d’un « cosmopolitisme de façade », comme dans de nombreuses villes nord-américaines, caractérisé par la ségrégation de chaque groupe ethnique dans un espace délimité ou des commerces spécifiques dans un quartier déterminé ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".