MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621185350 · doi:10.1109/icse-c.2017.70

Scenario-Based Learning in a MOOC Specialization Capstone on Software Product Management

2017· article· en· W2621185350 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenny Wong, Morgan Patzelt, Bradley Poulette, Rus Hathaway

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCapstoneComputer scienceCapstone courseContext (archaeology)TeamworkPersonal software processProduct (mathematics)Software engineeringSoftware developmentMultimediaSoftwareProcess (computing)Engineering managementWorld Wide WebComponent (thermodynamics)EngineeringSoftware constructionManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) is a popular way for universities to deliver quality course content to a global audience. Furthermore, a MOOC specialization offers a series of related such courses with a capstone component. Typical software engineering capstone projects in campus courses involve teamwork and creating software. Within such a context, students experience the software development process and human dynamics. However, MOOC capstones need to work for individual learners, and scale to handle thousands of potential learners. Consequently, this paper outlines our approach in using scenario-based learning to simulate an environment of interacting with others for a learner playing the role of a software product manager.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesFrench-language works237,207