MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621190005

Creating Critical Classrooms: Reading and Writing with an Edge (2Nd Ed.)

2015· article· en· W2621190005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Arts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyPedagogyCurriculumCritical literacySociologyContext (archaeology)Reading (process)Mathematics educationPsychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology & Critical Literacy in Early Childhood by Vivian Maria Vasquez and Carol Branigan Felderman, New York, NY: Routledge, 2012, 128 pp., ISBN 978-0- 415- 53950- 0In scope, Technology and Critical Literacy in Early Childhood highlights the work of preservice and inservice teachers, as well as teacher leaders in settings such as learning cooperatives, public schools, and private schools in Washington DC, North Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, and Ontario, Canada. Written for preservice and classroom teachers and teacher educators, this text explores the integration of literacy, social studies, and science with new forms of communication in early childhood settings (ages 3-8). It provides clear examples of how professional standards and sound classroom practices work together to enrich the lives of young children. This well-written and accessible text also offers ways to enact social justice themes that position children as highly engaged, critical literacy users. The authors embed Reflection Points, invitations to Try This, and resource boxes to help readers move beyond the text into their personal classroom spaces.The first chapter, Setting a Context for Exploring Critical Literacies Using Technology, and last chapter, Desires, Identities, and New Communication Technologies, set up the theoretical underpinnings of critical literacies and how new communications impact children's literacy development and identities. These chapters provide clear rationales and guidelines so teachers can implement highly effective curricula. Each chapter provides examples of lessons, teacher and student interactions, and results obtained when children are immersed in such classrooms.Chapter 2, Teaching and Learning with Voice Thread, and Chapter 3, Yes We Can!: Using Technology as a Tool for Social Action, illustrate the use of VoiceThread in a variety of classrooms. In a first-grade charter school classroom, children discussed and wrote about social justice issues. Small groups researched issues people face in different countries. One group met Lubo, an African man who was rescued as a child from a refugee camp and relocated to North Carolina. As an adult, he dreamed of helping other children like himself. This group used VoiceThread to talk with refugees in Africa and inform others about their project. These projects helped them study life in different countries and be advocates to change unfair issues children can face. In other Pre-K- first- grade classrooms, children explored their classrooms and communities using technology in social studies and science. One Pre-K class studied water and pollution and helped others save on energy; another class learned about endangered animals and the rainforest; yet another first-grade class studied the weather and produced weather forecasts for their school. Across these contexts, students used information gained to develop technology and communication skills, thus bettering their own lives and the lives of others in their schools and communities.Chapter 4, Our Families Don't Understand English! and Chapter 5, What about Antarctica? describe second-grade podcasts that address issues of diversity, difference, language, and power. Most of these students from seven different countries participated in free or reduced-free lunch programs, so these issues were of personal import. A touching story of Subrina, a Latina student from Guatemala, illustrates how podcasts foster growth in oral and written communication. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it