Creating Critical Classrooms: Reading and Writing with an Edge (2Nd Ed.)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Technology & Critical Literacy in Early Childhood by Vivian Maria Vasquez and Carol Branigan Felderman, New York, NY: Routledge, 2012, 128 pp., ISBN 978-0- 415- 53950- 0In scope, Technology and Critical Literacy in Early Childhood highlights the work of preservice and inservice teachers, as well as teacher leaders in settings such as learning cooperatives, public schools, and private schools in Washington DC, North Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, and Ontario, Canada. Written for preservice and classroom teachers and teacher educators, this text explores the integration of literacy, social studies, and science with new forms of communication in early childhood settings (ages 3-8). It provides clear examples of how professional standards and sound classroom practices work together to enrich the lives of young children. This well-written and accessible text also offers ways to enact social justice themes that position children as highly engaged, critical literacy users. The authors embed Reflection Points, invitations to Try This, and resource boxes to help readers move beyond the text into their personal classroom spaces.The first chapter, Setting a Context for Exploring Critical Literacies Using Technology, and last chapter, Desires, Identities, and New Communication Technologies, set up the theoretical underpinnings of critical literacies and how new communications impact children's literacy development and identities. These chapters provide clear rationales and guidelines so teachers can implement highly effective curricula. Each chapter provides examples of lessons, teacher and student interactions, and results obtained when children are immersed in such classrooms.Chapter 2, Teaching and Learning with Voice Thread, and Chapter 3, Yes We Can!: Using Technology as a Tool for Social Action, illustrate the use of VoiceThread in a variety of classrooms. In a first-grade charter school classroom, children discussed and wrote about social justice issues. Small groups researched issues people face in different countries. One group met Lubo, an African man who was rescued as a child from a refugee camp and relocated to North Carolina. As an adult, he dreamed of helping other children like himself. This group used VoiceThread to talk with refugees in Africa and inform others about their project. These projects helped them study life in different countries and be advocates to change unfair issues children can face. In other Pre-K- first- grade classrooms, children explored their classrooms and communities using technology in social studies and science. One Pre-K class studied water and pollution and helped others save on energy; another class learned about endangered animals and the rainforest; yet another first-grade class studied the weather and produced weather forecasts for their school. Across these contexts, students used information gained to develop technology and communication skills, thus bettering their own lives and the lives of others in their schools and communities.Chapter 4, Our Families Don't Understand English! and Chapter 5, What about Antarctica? describe second-grade podcasts that address issues of diversity, difference, language, and power. Most of these students from seven different countries participated in free or reduced-free lunch programs, so these issues were of personal import. A touching story of Subrina, a Latina student from Guatemala, illustrates how podcasts foster growth in oral and written communication. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle