MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621306482

Green IT Practices across Industries: A Text-Mining based Analysis

2017· article· en· W2621306482 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Deng, Shaobo Ji, Yun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceData scienceInformation retrievalArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we employ a practical perspective and examine the Green IT (GIT) practices across industries using a dictionary-based text mining method. Our research includes two phases: 1) building a GIT dictionary for text mining, and 2) examining GIT practices proliferation in non-IT industries. As the first attempt of using dictionary-based text mining method to study the Green IT practices, this paper has two main implications. First, through building the Green IT dictionary, we provide a broad view of current Green IT practices and present a tool that can be used to examine Green IT practices in future research. Second, while employing a practical perspective, this paper identifies some research gaps which could be addressed in future GIT research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207