MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621328196

Study of phosphogypsum-fly ash-lime solidified material

2001· article· hu· W2621328196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphogypsumFly ashLimeMaterials scienceMetallurgyMicrostructureSlag (welding)Base (topology)Building materialWaste managementComposite materialRaw materialEngineeringMathematicsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new type solidified material chiefly composed with phosphogypsum fly ash lime is prepared in this paper.Its mix proportion is optimized.It is submitted that the ratio of phosphogypsum and fly ash about 1∶1 and the content of solidified material made of lime about 6%~8% is the optimum mix proportion.This kind of solidified material can be used as road base course material when its compacting ratio is 93%~96%.It can be used as sub base material when tis compacting ratio is around 93%.Crushed stone stabilized with it can be used as road base material too.Microstructure of this kind of materials is observed with SEM and its strength forming mechanism is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeomechanics and Mining EngineeringFrench-language works237,207