MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621332976 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2017.2710348

Real-Time System-on-Chip Emulation of Electrothermal Models for Power Electronic Devices via Hammerstein Configuration

2017· article· en· W2621332976 on OpenAlexafffund
Tian Liang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsEmulationPower electronicsComputer scienceThyristorElectronicsElectronic engineeringSoftwareEmbedded systemPower (physics)Insulated-gate bipolar transistorChipEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time emulation of device-level power electronics plays an essential role in many industrial applications for design and hardware-in-the-loop testing of system components and controllers. Due to the complexity and heavy computational burden of the real-time hardware implementation of the analytical and the numerical models, this paper proposes dynamic electrothermal behavioral models for diode, thyristor, and insulated-gate bipolar transistor based on the Hammerstein configuration. The power electronic device model parameters are extracted from the known device datasheets and implemented in Zynq System-on-Chip platform with accelerated processing for real-time application. An electromagnetic rail gun system has been employed as the study case to compare the performance of the proposed electrothermal behavioral models with that of off-line simulation models on SaberRD software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207