MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621488043 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2016-0606

Investigation of immersion influence on dynamic properties of high-speed railway subgrade with semi-rigid waterproof functional layer through field-excitation testing

2017· article· en· W2621488043 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liangliang Wang, X. L. Lei, Shukui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Railway Eryuan Engineering GroupCentral South University
KeywordsSubgradeGeotechnical engineeringShrinkageService lifeVibrationWaterproofingStructural engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subgrade below the under-construction Kunming–Shanghai high-speed railway faces serious stability problems induced by considerable swelling and shrinkage volume change of expansive soil along with variation of moisture content. To prevent the occurrence of potential damage, reasons for the frequent occurrence of drainage ditch breakage and platform damage along the railway corridor in expansive soil areas were analyzed. A novel integral ancillary facility and semi-rigid waterproof functional layer were developed. Large-scale field dynamic tests were carried out to investigate the fatigue performance of the waterproof functional layer and the influences of different service environments (relatively dry condition and immersion condition) on the dynamic response of the subgrade. Results show that the fatigue property and waterproofing capability of the waterproof functional layer can fulfill the standard requirements for the high-speed railway subgrade. There was an enlargement phenomenon of the dynamic stress and vibration velocity when the service environment of subgrade changed from a relatively dry condition to an immersion condition. The vibration velocity seemed to increase along the depth of the graded broken stone surface layer and decrease linearly with further depth increase from the bottom surface of the waterproof functional layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207