Derivative Kernels: Numerics and Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A generalized framework for numerical differentiation (ND) is proposed for constructing a finite impulse response (FIR) filter in closed form. The framework regulates the frequency response of ND filters for arbitrary derivative-order and cutoff frequency selected parameters relying on interpolating power polynomials and maximally flat design techniques. Compared with the state-of-the-art solutions, such as Gaussian kernels, the proposed ND filter is sharply localized in the Fourier domain with ripple-free artifacts. Here, we construct 2D MaxFlat kernels for image directional differentiation to calculate image differentials for arbitrary derivative order, cutoff level and steering angle. The resulted kernel library renders a new solution capable of delivering discrete approximation of gradients, Hessian, and higher-order tensors in numerous applications. We tested the utility of this library on three different imaging applications with main focus on the unsharp masking. The reported results highlight the high efficiency of the 2D MaxFlat kernel and its versatility with respect to robustness and parameter control accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".