MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621596755 · doi:10.3917/hmc.040.0081

L’approche environnementale canadienne du gouvernement Harper et l’influence des évangéliques sur ses politiques à effets climatiques

2016· article· fr· W2621596755 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louis Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire, monde et cultures religieuses/Histoire, monde & cultures religieuses · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Canada, le gouvernement du Parti conservateur dirigé par Stephen Harper (2006-2015) a retiré le pays du Protocole de Kyoto et torpillé systématiquement toute réglementation visant la réduction des gazes à effets de serre ( Ges ). Ce chapitre se propose de décrire et mieux comprendre le combat antiécologique mené par le parti conservateur au sein du Parlement fédéral. Il fait voir un lien entre la théologie des organisations évangéliques montant en puissance sur la scène politique et la surprenante dénégation systématique de l’urgence climatique au Canada durant cette période.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.016
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire, monde et cultures religieuses/Histoire, monde & cultures religieusesSame topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207