MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621616459 · doi:10.20396/liames.v0i11.1497

A flexão de terceira pessoa nas línguas Jê

2011· article· pt· W2621616459 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Pablo Salanova

Bibliographic record

VenueLIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O propósito deste trabalho é descrever a expressão da terceira pessoa em algumas línguas da família Jê. Propomos uma análise, que supomos válida desde um ponto de vista diacrônico, que permite unificar uma série de fatos à primeira vista não relacionados, que ocorrem em várias línguas da família. Essa análise propõe-se como uma alternativa à análise mais difundida de alguns dos mesmos dados, baseada na noção de prefixos relacionais (Rodrigues 1990, 2010).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLIAMES Línguas Indígenas AmericanasSame topicLinguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207