MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621708635 · doi:10.1093/fs/knx103

F <scp>rançoise</scp> P <scp>ascal</scp> , M <scp>arie-</scp> C <scp>atherine</scp> D <scp>esjardins</scp> , A <scp>ntoinette</scp> D <scp>eshoulières</scp> , and C <scp>atherine</scp> D <scp>urand</scp> , <i>Challenges to Traditional Authority: Plays by French Women Authors 1650–1700</i> . Edited and translated by P <scp>erry</scp> G <scp>ethner</scp> PascalFrançoise, DesjardinsMarie-Catherine, DeshoulièresAntoinette, and DurandCatherine, <i>Challenges to Traditional Authority: Plays by French Women Authors 1650–1700</i> . Edited and translated by GethnerPerry. (Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 477; The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, 36.) Toronto: Iter Academic Press, 2015. xi + 308 pp.

2017· article· en· W2621708635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helena Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyContext (archaeology)BiographyGensHistoryArtArt historyTragicomedyLiteratureClassicsHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perry Gethner’s translated edition is appropriately included in a series dedicated to publishing male- and female-authored works that championed women and are little known to anglophone audiences. Gethner includes four plays by seventeenth-century female dramatists: Françoise Pascal’s Endymion (1657), Mme de Villedieu’s Nitétis (1663), Antoinette Deshoulières’s Genséric (1680), and Catherine Durand’s Comédies en proverbes (1699). He has selected these particular playwrights because they all pioneered developments in women’s contributions to theatre: Pascal was the first woman to have her plays staged publicly by a professional troupe; Villedieu the first to have her plays staged by a professional company in Paris; Deshoulières’s Genséric pioneers a ‘reflection and refusal of the Racinian model’ (p. 170); and Durand was one of the first women to publish in the genre of ‘proverb comedies’. This study provides a general overview of the context for women’s dramatic writing in the second half of the seventeenth century, a time when women writers began to gain ‘popular and critical recognition’ for their plays (p. 3), which were intended for the first time for public performance. It includes an introduction to the genres of tragedy, comedy, and tragicomedy; each play is prefaced with a short introductory biography of its author and details of the play’s context, although, as Gethner explains, the ephemeral nature of many of the sources — little is known about whether Pascal’s or Durand’s works were performed nor about how many runs Villedieu’s play enjoyed — mirrored at times by the paucity of information about their authors’ lives, makes full detail impossible. Collectively these plays span different genres (tragicomedy, tragedy, comedy): given the traditional nature of these genres, Gethner suggests, their authors’ originality can be better assessed. Indeed, Gethner argues that uniting all these plays is a distinctly ‘female perspective’ (p. 1), which manifests itself in representations of character (for instance, Endymion has the characteristics expected of a virtuous woman); in modifications of historical or mythological plot (Nitétis is deliberately focused on a woman); or even in genre (Durand’s work, published as part of the comtesse de Murat’s novel, Voyage de campagne (1699), represented the first time that what was traditionally a salon game akin to charades was included in a novel). Underpinning these ‘challenges to traditional authority’ is the influence of the social and aesthetic code of galanterie: this influence is particularly evident in the generic hybridity of many of these works. Some stylistic features have been retained in translation, although Gethner transforms alexandrine rhyming couplets into blank-verse iambic pentameter. The vocabulary and register are modernized, with poetic devices simplified (e.g. ‘fire’ for ‘passion’) — no doubt with performance in mind, as Gethner stresses the importance of making these works ‘as readable and as stageworthy as possible’ for a contemporary audience (p. 19) — and a careful balance is struck between the accessible and the literary. The plays are accompanied by useful explanatory notes, making this book a very important introduction both to French women playwrights and their context for an English-speaking audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207