MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621764769

Identità personale, bene comune e responsabilità personale: alcune riflessioni a partire dal confessionale scotista

2016· article· it· W2621764769 on OpenAlexaff
Matteo Scozia

Bibliographic record

VenueScripta mediaevalia: revista de pensamiento medieval · 2016
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Philosophy and Theology
Canadian institutionsPontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este articulo voy a presentar la posicion de Escoto sobre el sacramento de la confesion y estudiar los conceptos filosoficos de la identidad personal, el bien comun y la responsabilidad personal, que son importantes para la ontologia y la filosofia practica de Escoto. El tema principal es el secreto confesional, lo cual es necesario para salvaguardar el bien comun. Una lectura analitica pondra de relieve la innovacion de Escoto en el analisis de un tema discutido ampliamente en la Escolastica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScripta mediaevalia: revista de pensamiento medievalSame topicMedieval Philosophy and TheologyFrench-language works237,207