MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621764769

Identità personale, bene comune e responsabilità personale: alcune riflessioni a partire dal confessionale scotista

2016· article· it· W2621764769 on OpenAlexaff
Matteo Scozia

Bibliographic record

VenueScripta mediaevalia: revista de pensamiento medieval · 2016
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Philosophy and Theology
Canadian institutionsPontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este articulo voy a presentar la posicion de Escoto sobre el sacramento de la confesion y estudiar los conceptos filosoficos de la identidad personal, el bien comun y la responsabilidad personal, que son importantes para la ontologia y la filosofia practica de Escoto. El tema principal es el secreto confesional, lo cual es necesario para salvaguardar el bien comun. Una lectura analitica pondra de relieve la innovacion de Escoto en el analisis de un tema discutido ampliamente en la Escolastica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.027
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScripta mediaevalia: revista de pensamiento medievalSame topicMedieval Philosophy and TheologyFrench-language works237,207