MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621853903

RANKING THE LOCATION DETERMINANTS AS PER THEIR IMPORTANCE FOR THE FOREIGN INVESTORS – A SURVEY

2012· article· en· W2621853903 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Tondeva Pavlovska

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEU Law and Policy Analysis
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRanking (information retrieval)BusinessSurvey researchBusiness administrationComputer scienceInformation retrieval
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the analysis of results gained from the surveys undertaken by international organisations, and based on personal survey, the aim of the research was to contribute to the identification of relevant determinants that have influence on multinational company’s location decisions when investing abroad. By using the method of questionnaire we have performed a survey in order to reveal the perception of the foreign investors in Macedonia. According to UNCTAD’s survey the most important location determinants globally are the following: the macroeconomic and political stability, the quality of telecommunications, availability and cost of the highly skilled labour, corporate taxes and quality of the banking and financial services. The analyses of the perception of the foreign investors in Macedonia shows that the corporate taxation is of the highest importance, followed by the political and macroeconomic stability, personal taxation and investment incentives. Additional analyses per sectors and type of investment (horisontal or vertical) shows variety of factor rankings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicEU Law and Policy AnalysisFrench-language works237,207