MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621926168 · doi:10.1002/jtr.2133

An experience‐based typology for natural event tourists

2017· article· en· W2621926168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martinette Kruger, Melville Saayman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Tourism Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsSeekersVisitor patternCasualTypologyEvent (particle physics)TourismNatural (archaeology)MarketingMarket segmentationAdvertisingBusinessPsychologyPublic relationsSociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research identified viable target markets at one of the largest salmon runs in Canada. We segmented the markets according to the factors these natural event viewers regard as important for a memorable experience. This gave us a typology of viewers that we labelled “selective experience seekers, tranquil experience seekers, comprehensive experience seekers,” and “casual experience seekers.” Our results show that such segmentation is a useful research tool for producing a clear visitor profile. It enabled us to provide strategic insights for managing the salmon run viewing experience, and similar natural events, according to the preferences of specific market segments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.566
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Tourism ResearchSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207