Bibliographic record
Abstract
I made the presentation entitled “Mobile knowledge workers working anytime anywhere?” to an audience with various disciplinary backgrounds from around the world at the 2nd World Social Sciences Forum in Montreal, Quebec, on October 15, 2013. The theme of the Forum was Social Transformations and the Digital Age, covering a wide range of topics such as big/open data, research libraries’ role in data stewardship, intergenerational communication, and privacy and surveillance. My presentation was part of a symposium on New Forms of Work. The other presentations at the symposium ranged from understanding work, family, and technology figurations in the home, corporate crisis management in times of social media, to immaterial labour, monetization, commodification and the political in social media. The international audience showed general interest in telework and mobile work as changes in the world of work. My presentation was received well, with several colleagues sharing related work or requesting for a copy of my presentation and related papers for use in their teaching and research. Participation in other sessions at the Forum provided further food for thought for my teaching and research as our society is being transformed in many ways in this digital age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".