Histoire de la communication scientifique en Chine : un instrument politique de modernisation et de compétitivité économique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Chine, dès 1949, s’est dotée d’une politique de développement de la culture scientifique, alors que les pays occidentaux stimulés par l’OCDE ne la valoriseront qu’à partir des années 1980. Tout comme en Europe, la nécessité de promouvoir une culture scientifique s’est imposée en Chine au cours du 19e siècle. Car les Chinois ont compris que pour émuler les puissances coloniales, il leur fallait maîtriser les sciences et les techniques. Mais les initiatives étaient restées largement privées. Avec l’arrivée de Mao Zedong au pouvoir, la culture scientifique s’arrime au projet de développement voulu par le Parti. Toutefois, ce n’est qu’avec les réformes de Deng Xiaoping, à partir de 1978, qu’elle est totalement intégrée dans un plan d’ensemble de développement économique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".