MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622264455 · doi:10.1079/9781780647845.0135

Precision agriculture in lime: potential for application of precision agriculture technologies in lime cropping systems.

2017· book-chapter· en· W2622264455 on OpenAlexaff
Aitazaz A. Farooque, Qamar U. Zaman, Arnold W. Schumann, Travis J. Esau

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecision agricultureAgricultural engineeringLimeCroppingProductivityAgricultureField cropEnvironmental scienceSustainabilityAutomationCropping systemAgroforestryEngineeringAgronomyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> In order to apply crop inputs on an as need basis, map and sensor-based precision agriculture (PA) technologies could be implemented in lime (Rutaceae) production for effective management of inputs to improve crop productivity. PA has several components, i.e. a differential global positioning system, a geographical information system, analysis of tree characteristics and field conditions, real-time measurement of soil properties, crop stress, pest pressure and disease using advanced sensors, control systems for automation of field operations, variable rate (VR) technology and yield monitoring systems. This chapter discusses PA technologies and their potential application in lime cropping systems to enhance productivity, reduce production cost and ensure environmental sustainability. It is concluded that spatial and temporal variations in soil properties, leaf nutrients and tree size in lime groves demand VR management of crop inputs to improve growth and productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207