MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622279009

The Maximum Return-on-investment Plant Location Problem with Market Share

2005· article· en· W2622279009 on OpenAlexaff
Jack Brimberg, Pierre Hansen, Gilbert Laporte, Nenad Mladenović, Dragan Urošević

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du GERAD · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsMathematical optimizationTabu searchExtension (predicate logic)Simple (philosophy)Variable (mathematics)MathematicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the plant location problem under the objective of maximizing return-on-investment. However, in place of the standard assumption that all demands must be satisfied, we impose a minimum acceptable level on market share. The model presented takes the form of a linear fractional mixed integer program. Based on properties of the model, a local search procedure is developed to solve the problem heuristically. Variable neighbourhood search and tabu search heuristics are also developed and tested. Thus, a useful extension of the simple plant location problem is examined, and heuristics are developed for the first time to solve realistic instances of this problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du GERADSame topicFacility Location and Emergency ManagementFrench-language works237,207