PENERAPAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP GOOD GOVERNANCE DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN REFORMA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agrarian reform is one of solutions to overcome the poverty. The agrarian reform needs a political commitment from the government. In addition, agrarian information is important to figure out the problems and its potential to overcome the problems. Agrarian reform can not depend on the authority and political power of the government only, it also needs the involvement of the community and other stakeholders. In the context of regional authonomy, the authority of agrarian reform will be the authority of the local government, therefore the involvement of the community in every stage is necessary. National Planning for Agrarian Reform Programme should be conformed with the characteristics of the region and the inputs from the stakeholders, since they understand the situation and the agrarian problems in the region.Keywords: agrarian reform, stakeholders, landreform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it