Smooth muscle function and myosin polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smooth muscle is able to function over a much broader length range than striated muscle. The ability to maintain contractility after a large length change is thought to be due to an adaptive process involving restructuring of the contractile apparatus to maximize overlap between the contractile filaments. The molecular mechanism for the length-adaptive behavior is largely unknown. In smooth muscle adapted to different lengths we quantified myosin monomers, basal and activation-induced myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation, shortening velocity, power output and active force. The muscle was able to generate a constant maximal force over a two fold length range when it was allowed to go through isometric contraction/relaxation cycles after each length change (length adaptation). In the relaxed state, myosin monomer concentration and basal MLC phosphorylation decreased linearly, while in the activated state activation-induced MLC phosphorylation and shortening velocity/power output increased linearly with muscle length. The results suggest that recruitment of myosin monomers and oligomers into the actin filament lattice (where they form force-generating filaments) occurs during muscle adaptation to longer length, with the opposite occurring during adaptation to shorter length.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".