Structure Solution of Metal-Oxide Li Battery Cathodes from Simulated Annealing and Lithium NMR Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discerning the arrangement of transition metal atoms in Li[Ni x Mn y Co z ]O 2 cathode materials has remained an open problem for many years despite the commercial importance of some stoichiometries and the even more promising characteristics of others. We present a method for structural determination in this class of cathode materials. A simple definition of the total energy, based on the chemical principle of electroneutrality, is used in combination with a simulated annealing algorithm to generate model structures. The method reproduces the well-known structure of Li[Li 1/3 Mn 2/3 ]O 2 and produces structures of the disordered Li[Ni x Mn x Co 1–2 x ]O 2 phases (where x = 0.02, 0.1, 0.33) that are verified by detailed 7 Li NMR spectra. For each Li[Ni x Mn x Co 1–2 x ]O 2 phase, the solution is found to be heavily disordered, yet retaining significant ion pairing. Since the underlying notion of favoring charge-neutral regions is generic, we anticipate its utility in a much broader family of materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".