MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622723040 · doi:10.1121/1.4987728

The upper ocean ambient sound field as a tool to address significant scientific and societal questions

2017· article· en· W2622723040 on OpenAlexaff
Svein Vagle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Ambient noise levelUnderwaterNoise (video)Field (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Environmental scienceOceanographyAcousticsGeologyMeteorologyComputer scienceGeographyPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David Farmer’s keen interest in understanding the dynamics of the upper-ocean and air-sea interaction convinced him that studying and using the naturally occurring high-frequency oceanic sound field would give additional insight into these processes. Breaking surface waves are important to ocean dynamics and were believed to be a significant source of the observed sound field. However, direct measurements were lacking. In the mid-1980s and onwards, David Farmer and his students developed a range of new observational techniques and instrumentation which would significantly improve our understanding of the sound field itself and how it relates to parameters such as wind speed and wave conditions, and as a tool to understanding the more fundamental physical processes of the upper ocean. All this research resulted in significant progress in our understanding of wave breaking, air-sea interaction, air-sea gas transfer, and indirectly to upper-ocean bubble distributions and dynamics, ice generated sound, and the role of anthropogenic noise on marine fauna. Here, we review key outcomes of this research and discuss how several components of Farmer et al.’s work now is being used to address significant societal issues with regard to the impacts of increasing levels of man-made underwater noise on marine life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207