Expanding the Capabilities of Constraint-based Metabolic Models for Biotechnology Purposes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past decade, the constraint-based approach to metabolic modeling has become an important tool for understanding and controlling biology. Unfortunately, the application of this novel approach to systems biology in biotechnology has been limited by three significant technical issues: existing metabolic modeling methods cannot completely model the overflow metabolism, cannot model the metabolism of microbial communities, and cannot design strains optimized for productivity and titer. Three computational methods – the Flux Balance Analysis with Membrane Economics (FBAME) method, the Dynamic Multi-species Metabolic Modeling (DyMMM) framework, and the Dynamic Strain Scanning Optimization (DySScO) strategy – have been developed to resolve these issues respectively.\nFirst, the FBAME method, which adopts the membrane occupancy limitation hypothesis, was used to explain and predict the phenomenon of overflow metabolism, an important metabolic phenomenon in industrial fermentation, in Escherichia coli. Then, the DyMMM framework was used to investigate the community metabolism during uranium bioremediation, and demonstrated that the simultaneous addition of acetate and Fe(III) may be a theoretically viable uranium bioremediation strategy. Lastly, the DySScO strategy, which combines the DyMMM framework with existing strain design algorithms, was used to design commodity-chemical producing E. coli optimized for a balanced product yield, titer, and volumetric productivity. These novel computational methods allow for broader applications of constraint-based metabolic models in biotechnology settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".