Os movimentos do olhar: do encontro do Real ao deslocamento estético, o cinema de Gus Van Sant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research analysis three films directed by Gus Van Sant, from United States, were selected: Elephant (2003), Last Days (2005) and Paranoid Park (2007) These three movies, often studied as a trilogy, are not only connected by a common aesthetical field, but also in its propositional politics, since the three movies present social facts and events (more like how events are brought up in the field of journalism). Therefore, the research considers as its starting point the factual reality and the construction of its possible representations. We are not specifically talking about Realism, as it's approached as a gender, but, most of all, according to the political questions and sociability evoked by our object. This research aims to point three parameters in order to discuss the contemporary cinema and its option into the political and visibility's fields. We're focused in three dimensions of the gaze posed considering the cinematographic discourse: 1) the author's gaze, that aims to create a tendency in an enunciation, 2. the scene's gaze and the images' performativity, that stress the position of the authorship's intentionality; 3. the gaze of the social scene, that meets the images' political position, from the spectator to its circulation. This process was named as gaze dialectic, since it is capable of constructing at every moment spaces of alterity, or, Itself and the Other in the image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".