MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623089400 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004099

SUDEP

2017· letter· en· W2623089400 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Buchhalter, Gregory D. Cascino

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatus epilepticusEpilepsyAutopsyMedicineCause of deathStroke (engine)PediatricsPopulationPsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was originally defined as a sudden, unexpected death in an individual with epilepsy, witnessed or not, and not associated with drowning or status epilepticus, for which a cause cannot be identified upon autopsy examination.1 Cases can be divided into definite, probable, and possible based upon the level of diagnostic certainty, especially after postmortem examination.2 As research criteria have evolved, a more comprehensive set of diagnostic criteria has been derived, including the term plus to indicate that another cause could have resulted in death, e.g., SUDEP probable/plus.3 During the last 20 years, SUDEP has become recognized as an important cause of premature mortality in the epilepsy population and is second only to stroke as the most common neurologic disorder responsible for the most potential years of life lost due its occurrence prior to late adulthood.4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207