MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623117634

Production of Bulk Metallic Glasses for Use in Airborne Gravity Gradiometry

2016· dissertation· en· W2623117634 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua Igel

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrystallizationMaterials scienceAmorphous metalMetallurgyCastingAlloyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsChemistryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) are ideal candidates for airborne gravity gradiometer (AGG) flexures due to their unique mechanical properties. In this thesis, the role of processing variables in the production Zr-based BMGs by arc melting and suction casting was investigated and an electrochemical method for determining the degree of crystallization after electric discharge machining (EDM) was examined. Homogenization was most effectively obtained using multiple melting iterations and prolonged melting times. The difference between input and actual Zr concentration was found to be significant in arc melting and suction casting. Superior GFA was obtained using high purity argon purge gas and low purity Zr contrary to the consensus that GFA strictly increases with increasing raw material purities. The use of potentiostatic polarization in 1M NaNO3 for evaluating the degree of crystallization in Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5 samples after EDM may be feasible due to the dependence of passivation behaviour on the degree of crystallization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous AlloysFrench-language works237,207