PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY TRAINNING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK BESARAN DAN SATUAN DI KELAS X SEMESTER I SMA NEGERI 7 MEDAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Inquiry Training terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA dan aktivitas belajar siswa selama proses pembelejaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desai penelitian Two Group Pretest-Postest Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA N 7 Medan yang terdiri dari 5 kelas dan sampel 2 kelas yang ditentukan secara cluster rondom sampling, yaitu kelas X IPA 5 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X IPA 1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Dari uji hipotesis diperoleh ada pengaruh yang signifikan antara hasil belajar siswa dengan pembelajaran inquiry training dan pemebelajaran konvensional pada materi pokok besaran dan satuan dikelas X SMA N 7 Medan. Kata Kunci : Model pembelajaran inquiry training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it