MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623134759 · doi:10.18311/jsst/2007/1957

Seeding Method for the Synthesis of Flower like Gold Nanoparticles and Nanowires in Pluronic P103 Micellar Phase as Soft Template

2007· article· en· W2623134759 on OpenAlexaff
Mandeep Singh Bakshi, Poonam Bhandari, Aman Kaura, Gurinder Kaur, Tarlok S. Banipal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surface Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoloxamerNucleationColloidal goldSeedingMaterials scienceMicelleNanowireNanoparticleNanotechnologyChemical engineeringPhase (matter)Nanoscopic scaleChemistryCopolymerOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionComposite materialPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seed-growth method has been applied to synthesize flower like gold nanoparticles capped with pluronic P103 which on subsequent growth steps eventually lead to the formation of nanowires of variable thickness. During this reaction, a simultaneous self-aggregation of P103 micelles into liquid crystalline tubes has also been achieved which served as soft template for the further nucleation of gold nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surface Science and TechnologySame topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207