Bibliographic record
Abstract
This approach to Ewoclem sau Întortochiatele cӑrӑri (Ewoclem or the Entangled Paths), the Romanian-Canadian Eugene Giurgiu's novel published in 1996, has been inspired first of all by Gaston Bachelard's La poétique de l'espace - which marks the passage front psychoanalysis to phenomenology in the French philosopher's development, a "topo-analysis" that is connected to his "topophilia" - because it is very much like Canadians' obsession with representations of space. Another source would be Jean Baudrillard's Figures d'Altérité which brought about the train of thought connected to the relationship between changes of place and the "spectral" component of the immigrant's identity. While becoming "another", the immigrant is permanently "haunted" and "inhabited" by his former selves generated by the connection with the space of origin. The same author's book on the system of objects has engendered the idea of the importance of possession in appropriating a new place. But most helpful for the exploration of the text beyond its surface structure have been Jacques Derrida's reflections on hospitality. I added to it the sub-theme of "conviviality" in which, instead of "giving" and "receiving", the stress falls on "sharing".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".