MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623192645 · doi:10.3138/jcs.50.2.348

Policies and Practices: The Case of RAI-MDS in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes

2017· article· en· W2623192645 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hugh Armstrong, Tamara Daly, Jacqueline Choiniere

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum Data SetLong-term careSet (abstract data type)Term (time)PoliticsSociologyField (mathematics)Public administrationGerontologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceNursing homesNursingMedicineLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The RAI-MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set) is a widely used measurement tool in Canadian long-term care homes. In this article, we set this tool in the contexts of neo-liberalism and evidence-based medicine and comment on primary and secondary literature concerning its use. Using observations and interviews at several Canadian care homes, we focus on how RAI-MDS is perceived and implemented in the field. Our principal contribution is to empirically enrich the feminist political economy literature on the use of this important measurement tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0400.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207