MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623263577 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00682

Subspace Identification-Based Modeling and Control of Batch Particulate Processes

2017· article· en· W2623263577 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhinav Garg, Prashant Mhaskar

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsSubspace topologyRobustness (evolution)Model predictive controlComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Identification (biology)Process (computing)Process controlMathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of subspace-based model identification and predictive control of particulate process subject to uncertainty and time-varying parameters. To this end, subspace identification techniques are first adapted to handle the batch nature of the data. A linear model predictive controller (MPC) is next formulated to enable achieving a particle size distribution with desired characteristics subject to both manipulated input and product quality constraints. The proposed approach is implemented on a seeded batch crystallizer process and compared with an open-loop policy, as well as a traditional trajectory tracking policy, using classical control. The proposed MPC is shown to achieve superior performance and the ability to respect tighter product quality constraints, as well as robustness to uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207