MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2623454211

Meta-analysis for the prediction of net portal absorption (NPA) of amino acid-N (AAN) and ammonia (NH3) in ruminants

2010· preprint· en· W2623454211 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiano Côrtes, R. Martineau, Daniel Sauvant, D.R. Ouellet, Jean Vernet, Isabelle Ortigues Marty, H. Lapierre

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmmoniaAbsorption (acoustics)Net (polyhedron)Computer scienceChemistryMaterials scienceMathematicsBiochemistryComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal of Animal Science, Volume 88, E-Supplement 2 Journal of Dairy Science®, Volume 93, E-Supplement 1 Poultry Science®, Volume 89, E-Supplement 1 Journal of Animal Science, Volume 88, E-Supplement 2 Journal of Dairy Science®, Volume 93, E-Supplement 1 Poultry Science®, Volume 89, E-Supplement 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.059
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→