MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First Ministers, Cabinet, and the Public Service

2010· book-chapter· en· W2623568810 on OpenAlexaff
Donald J. Savoie

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabinet (room)Prime ministerPublic administrationPublic servicePolitical sciencePrime (order theory)Service (business)Work (physics)Government (linguistics)Public relationsLawEngineeringPoliticsBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article explores how the relationship among the prime minister, the cabinet, and public service has evolved and developed in the recent years. It also aims to identify the forces that have shaped and molded these transformations. The article begins by examining the growing power of the prime minister and central agencies, specifically the Prime Minister's Office (MPO). It then proceeds to discuss the cabinet, how it has transformed into more than a focus group, and why it no longer directs the work of the government. The article concludes with a discussion on public service and the transformations in the role of public service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207