MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623620649 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2017197

Notes on a theorem of Katznelson and Ornstein

2017· article· en· W2623620649 on OpenAlexaff
Habibulla Akhadkulov, Akhtam Dzhalilov, Konstantin Khanin

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLebesgue measureType (biology)Absolute continuityCombinatoricsIrrational numberRotation numberLebesgue integrationConjugacy classRotation (mathematics)Measure (data warehouse)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\log f'$ be an absolutely continuous and $f'/f'∈ L_{p}(S^{1}, d\ell)$ for some $p>1, $ where $\ell$ is Lebesgue measure. We show that there exists a subset of irrational numbers of unbounded type, such that for any element $\widehat{ρ}$ of this subset, the linear rotation $R_{\widehat{ρ}}$ and the shift $f_{t}=f+t\mod 1, $ $t∈ [0, 1)$ with rotation number $\widehat{ρ}, $ are absolutely continuously conjugate. We also introduce a certain Zygmund-type condition depending on a parameter $γ$, and prove that in the case $γ>\frac{1}{2}$ there exists a subset of irrational numbers of unbounded type, such that every circle diffeomorphism satisfying the corresponding Zygmund condition is absolutely continuously conjugate to the linear rotation provided its rotation number belongs to the above set. Moreover, in the case of $γ> 1, $ we show that the conjugacy is $C^{1}$-smooth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical SystemsSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207