MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623708115 · doi:10.4050/f-0072-2016-11486

Rotor Durability Advanced Technology Demonstration

2016· article· en· W2623708115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDurabilityRotor (electric)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotor Durability Advanced Technology Demonstration, a co-funded effort between the Aviation Applied Technology Directorate and Sikorsky Aircraft, demonstrated technologies leading to increased blade durability to support current and future Army Aviation platforms. Milestones for this program included demonstration of improved main and tail rotor environmental durability, repair-ability, and performance. This paper summarizes the work the Army and Sikorsky conducted to accomplish this objective, providing a means for significantly increased aircraft availability rate supporting an increased OPTEMPO for the baseline UH-60L aircraft and the UH-60M. The approaches proposed are expected to reduce life-cycle costs through an improvement-by-spares upgrade concept for the current fleet, as well as new blade designs for next generation aircraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it