MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623867980

C60:LiF hole blocking layer for Bulk-Heterojunction solar cells

2010· article· en· W2623867980 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dong Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsBlocking (statistics)HeterojunctionMaterials scienceLayer (electronics)OptoelectronicsNanotechnologyComputer scienceComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A standard procedure for P3HT:PCBM bulk-heterojunction solar cells has been developed. Fabrication conditions, such as environment; solution concentration, thickness of active layer or post-treatment methods are systematically optimized. The best device performance is obtained by slow-drying spin-coated P3HT:PCBM (1:0.8) blend layer with DCB as solvent. C60:LiF composite films with up to 80% LiF concentration as hole blocking layer have been developed to significantly increase power conversion efficiencies of OPV devices. The short-circuit current density is greatly enhanced, without sacrificing open-circuit voltage and fill factor. Due to its superior oxygen diffusion blocking effect, the C60:LiF composite layer also can provide a more effective passivation film than a thin LiF layer, resulting in an impressive enhancement in air stability of devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207