MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623947735 · doi:10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.9979

Abstract 9979: Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Marfan Syndrome

2015· article· en· W2623947735 on OpenAlexaff
Jill Handisides, Danielle Hollenbeck-Pringle, Karen Uzark, Felicia Trachtenberg, Victoria L. Pemberton, Teresa Atz, Timothy J. Bradley, Sylvia De Nobele, Georgeann Groh, Michelle Hamstra, Rosalind Korsin, Jami C. Levine, Meghan K. Mac Neal, Larry W. Markham, Tonia Morrison, Kathleen Mussatto, Aaron Olson, Mary Ella Pierpont, Mary J. Roman, Reed E. Pyeritz, Elizabeth Radojewski, Michelle Robinson, Elizabeth Sparks, Kathryn Waitzman, Mingfen Xu, Ronald V. Lacro

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMarfan syndromeAtenololQuality of life (healthcare)CohortInternal medicinePsychosocialPopulationLosartanPhysical therapyPediatricsCardiologyBlood pressureAngiotensin IIPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant disorder that affects the heart, aorta, eyes, skeleton, lungs, and other organs. Objective: To assess quality of life (QL) in a large multicenter cohort of children with MFS. Methods: The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was administered to 256 subjects with MFS ages 5-18 years as an ancillary study to the Pediatric Heart Network’s Marfan Trial, which compared the effects of atenolol vs. losartan on aortic root growth. PedsQL scores were compared to population norms by one-sample t-tests. Scores > 1 SD below the population sample mean represent at-risk status for impaired health-related QL. The impact of treatment arm (atenolol vs. losartan), severity of clinical features, and patient-reported symptoms on QL was assessed by general linear models. Results: The subjects had a mean age of 11.8±3.9 years and were 62% male, 84% white, and 88% non-Hispanic. Mean PedsQL scores for MFS subjects were significantly lower than population norms. Overall, scores were in the impaired range for physical QL and psychosocial QL in 34% and 27% of subjects, respectively. QL across multiple domains correlated negatively with frequency of patient-reported symptoms (r=0.32-0.40, p<.0001). Subjects with a reported neurodevelopmental disorder (mainly learning disability, attention deficit disorder, and/or hyperactivity) had lower mean QL scores (5.5-7.4 lower, p<.04). There were no significant differences in QL scores between treatment arms. We found no significant association between QL and aortic root z-score, extent of skeletal involvement, or presence of ectopia lentis. Conclusions: Children with MFS are at risk for impaired QL. Higher number of patient-reported symptoms had the greatest negative impact on QL, rather than treatment arm or severity of cardiac, skeletal, or ocular findings. Future interventions to address patient symptoms and neurodevelopmental disorders could improve QL for children with MFS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207