Enjeux psychiques des parentalités à risque et potentiels thérapeutiques du génogramme libre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les cliniciens confrontés aux parents en difficultés psychosociales témoignent régulièrement d’un sentiment d’impuissance à modifier les cycles (souvent générationnels) de la maltraitance infantile, soulevant ainsi leur besoin d’être davantage outillés. Spécifiquement, certaines caractéristiques de la clientèle posent des entraves singulières au processus de changement, telles qu’une demande d’aide lacunaire, un accès limité au monde intrapsychique (préférant l’agir ou le déni), ou l’aspect figé et hermétique du discours porté sur les difficultés personnelles et familiales. Une recherche-action permit l’utilisation – supervisée – du génogramme libre dans l’intervention menée auprès de huit jeunes mères en difficultés. L’analyse qualitative conceptualisante des données illustre le potentiel projectif et thérapeutique de ce dispositif, révélant au parent les attentes affectives et les conflits non-résolus agissant à son insu dans les liens générationnels, tout en amorçant en lui une dialectisation du discours figé et fataliste auparavant porté sur la filiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".