MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624064364 · doi:10.1109/vlsi-dat.2017.7939666

A current feedback instrumentation amplifier with chopping and dynamic element matching techniques and employing the current-reuse technique in input/feedback stages

2017· article· en· W2624064364 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tzu-Ying Chen, Yi-Lin Tsai, Tsung‐Hsien Lin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Computer scienceCurrent-feedback operational amplifierReuseAmplifierElectronic engineeringMatching (statistics)Instrumentation amplifierInstrumentation (computer programming)Operational amplifierControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringCMOSMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high-precision low-noise amplifier intended to be used in the front-end of an analog signal processing channel in sensor applications. A current feedback instrumentation amplifier (CFIA) with current-reuse (CR) topology employed chopping techniques to eliminate flicker (1/f) noise and offset due to amplifier, and the gain mismatch issue due to CR topology was solved by dynamic element matching (DEM) technique. This work was fabricated in a 0.35-μm CMOS TSMC process. After chopping the Gm1-Gmfband Gm2stages of CR-CFIA with 10kHz frequency, the input-referred noise power spectral density (PSD) was under 100nV/√Hz higher than 10kHz. The PSD effectively decreases below 100Hz. The gain of this system was 13. Total current supply was only 66.6μA. Total power consumption for analog block was 199.8μW under a 3-V supply and the core chip size was 0.81mm2(total area 3.01mm2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207